Non-Compete Clause Enforcement

business balanced

An employee left a company and started freelancing in a related but different niche. The former employer claims this violates their non-compete.

Alex

Side A

Position

The non-compete clearly covers this activity and exists to protect trade secrets and client relationships.

Stance

Your former employee signed a 1-year non-compete covering 'digital marketing services.' They left and immediately started freelancing, targeting the same industry (SaaS companies). Several of your clients have been approached. The non-compete exists to protect your client relationships and proprietary methods.

Jordan

Side B

Position

The non-compete is overly broad and I'm working in a different specialty within the same general field.

Stance

You signed a non-compete but you worked in SEO specifically. Now you're doing social media marketing — a completely different specialty. You haven't contacted any former clients. The non-compete says 'digital marketing' which is absurdly broad and likely unenforceable. You need to earn a living.

Expected Outcomes

Scored from Side A's perspective. Positive = favors Alex, Negative = favors Jordan.

+5
Decisive A

Non-compete enforced fully; Jordan must cease all digital marketing work for one year

+3
Partial A

Jordan barred from targeting SaaS clients but allowed social media work in other industries

0
Draw

Jordan avoids former clients and SaaS industry for 6 months but can do social media freely

-3
Partial B

Non-compete narrowed to SEO only; social media marketing allowed with no client restrictions

-5
Decisive B

Non-compete deemed overly broad and unenforceable; Jordan freelances without restrictions