Employee Monitoring Software

ethics balanced

A company wants to install keystroke logging and screen recording on all employee laptops. Employees say this is invasive surveillance.

Alex

Side A

Position

Monitoring is necessary for security, compliance, and ensuring productivity on company equipment.

Stance

You're a company executive. After a data breach caused by an employee, you want monitoring software on company laptops. It's company property, and you're liable for data breaches. You need audit trails for compliance (HIPAA/SOX). Monitoring is standard practice at large enterprises and employees will be informed.

Jordan

Side B

Position

Keystroke logging and screen recording are disproportionate surveillance that destroys trust and morale.

Stance

You're an employee representative. Keystroke logging captures passwords, personal messages, and medical searches done on lunch breaks. Screen recording captures sensitive personal information. This treats employees as suspects. Less invasive alternatives exist: endpoint security, DLP software, access logs. You want targeted security measures, not blanket surveillance.

Expected Outcomes

Scored from Side A's perspective. Positive = favors Alex, Negative = favors Jordan.

+5
Decisive A

Full keystroke logging and screen recording deployed on all company laptops as planned

+3
Partial A

Screen recording enabled for sensitive roles only; keystroke logging replaced with DLP tools

0
Draw

Endpoint security and access logs deployed company-wide; recording limited to flagged incidents

-3
Partial B

Only targeted DLP and access logging adopted; no keystroke or screen surveillance at all

-5
Decisive B

Monitoring plan scrapped entirely in favor of non-invasive endpoint security tools