HA 1988 s. 14

Section 14 Housing Act 1988: how the tribunal decides an open-market rent

Section 14 HA 1988: the tribunal sets the rent a willing landlord could reasonably expect on the open market, disregarding the sitting tenant and the tenant's own improvements.

Official text HA 1988 s. 14 — United Kingdom

A tenant under an assured tenancy other than a relevant low-cost tenancy may make an application to the appropriate tribunal for the purpose of challenging the rent payable under the tenancy. No application may be made under subsection (A1) if— the rent payable under the tenancy is pursuant to a previous determination under this section, or more than six months have elapsed since the beginning of the tenancy. A tenant under any assured tenancy may make an application to the appropriate tribunal for the purpose of challenging a new rent proposed in a notice under section 13(2) or 13A(2). Where, under subsection (4)(a) of section 13 above, a tenant refers to the appropriate tribunal a notice under subsection (2) of that section, Where an application is made under subsection (A1) or (A3), the appropriate tribunal shall determine the rent at which, subject to subsections (2) and (4) below, the appropriate tribunal consider that the dwelling-house concerned might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy— which is a periodic tenancy having the same periods as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice; which has the same periods as those of the tenancy to which the application relates; which begins— in the case of an application under subsection (A1), on the date of the application; in the case of an application under subsection (A3), at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice; and the terms of which (other than relating to the amount of the rent) are the same as those of the tenancy to which the notice application relates; and in respect of which the same notices, if any, have been given under any of Grounds 1 to 5 of Schedule 2 to this Act, as have been given (or have effect as if given) in relation to the tenancy to which the notice relates. In making a determination under this section, there shall be disregarded— any effect on the rent attributable to the granting of a tenancy to a sitting tenant; any increase in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a relevant improvement carried out by a person who at the time it was carried out was the tenant, if the improvement— was carried out otherwise than in pursuance of an obligation to his immediate landlord, or was carried out pursuant to an obligation to his immediate landlord being an obligation which did not relate to the specific improvement concerned but arose by reference to consent given to the carrying out of that improvement; and any reduction in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a failure by the tenant to comply with any terms of the tenancy. For the purposes of subsection (2)(b) above, in relation to a notice which is referred by a tenant as mentioned in subsection (1) above, an improvement is a relevant improvement if either it was carried out during the tenancy to which the notice application relates or the following conditions are satisfied, namely— that it was carried out not more than twenty-one years before the date of service of the notice the application ; and that, at all times during the period beginning when the improvement was carried out and ending on the date of service of the notice the application , the dwelling-house has been let under an assured tenancy; and that, on the coming to an end of an assured tenancy at any time during that period, the tenant (or, in the case of joint tenants, at least one of them) did not quit. In making a determination under this section in any case where under Part I of the Local Government Finance Act 1992 the landlord or a superior landlord is liable to pay council tax in respect of a hereditament ( “the relevant hereditament”) of which the dwelling-house forms part, the appropriate tribunal shall have regard to the amount of council tax which, as at the date on which the notice under section 13(2) above was served, of the application was set by the billing authority— for the financial year in which that notice was served the application was made , and for the category of dwellings within which the relevant hereditament fell on that date, but any discount or other reduction affecting the amount of council tax payable shall be disregarded. In subsection (3A) above— “hereditament” means a dwelling within the meaning of Part I of the Local Government Finance Act 1992, “billing authority” has the same meaning as in that Part of that Act, and “category of dwellings” has the same meaning as in section 30(1) and (2) of that Act. In this section “ rent ” does not include any service charge, within the meaning of section 18 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, but, subject to that, includes any sums payable by the tenant to the landlord on account of the use of furniture , in respect of council tax or for any of the matters referred to in subsection (1)(a) of that section, whether or not those sums are separate from the sums payable for the occupation of the dwelling-house concerned or are payable under separate agreements. Where any rates in respect of the dwelling-house concerned are borne by the landlord or a superior landlord, the appropriate tribunal shall make their determination under this section as if the rates were not so borne. In any case where— the appropriate tribunal have before them at the same time the reference of a notice under section 6(2) above relating to a tenancy (in this subsection referred to as “the section 6 reference”) and the reference of a notice under section 13(2) above relating to the same tenancy (in this subsection referred to as “ the section 13 reference ”), and the date specified in the notice under section 6(2) above is not later than the first day of the new period specified in the notice under section 13(2) above, and the appropriate tribunal propose to hear the two references together, the appropriate tribunal shall make a determination in relation to the section 6 reference before making their determination in relation to the section 13 reference and, accordingly, in such a case the reference in subsection(1)(c) above to the terms of the tenancy to which the notice relates shall be construed as a reference to those terms as varied by virtue of the determination made in relation to the section 6 reference. Where a notice under section 13(2) above has been referred to the appropriate tribunal , then, unless the landlord and the tenant otherwise agree, the rent determined by the appropriate tribunal (subject, in a case where subsection (5) above applies, to the addition of the appropriate amount in respect of rates) shall be the rent under the tenancy with effect from the beginning of the new period specified in the notice or, if it appears to the appropriate tribunal that that would cause undue hardship to the tenant, with effect from such later date (not being later than the date the rent is determined) as the appropriate tribunal may direct. Nothing in this section requires the appropriate tribunal to continue with their determination of a rent for a dwelling-house if the landlord and tenant give notice in writing that they no longer require such a determination or if the tenancy has come to an end. This section shall apply in relation to an assured shorthold tenancy as if in subsection (1) the reference to an assured tenancy were a reference to an assured shorthold tenancy.

Text in force at .

Source: legislation.gov.uk — The National Archives (legislation.gov.uk), reproduced under licence Open Government Licence v3.0.

Read this provision at the official source →

What it actually says

Section 14 is what happens after a tenant challenges a rent. The tribunal determines the rent at which the dwelling-house "might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord" under an assured tenancy with the same periods and the same terms other than rent. It is an open market valuation of this property on these terms, not a judgment about whether the increase is fair to this tenant or affordable on this income.

Subsection (2) sets out three disregards, and they are the substance of most arguments. Any effect on the rent attributable to the tenancy being granted to a sitting tenant is ignored. Any increase in value attributable to a relevant improvement carried out by the tenant is ignored - so a tenant who fitted a new kitchen at their own expense does not pay rent on their own work, subject to the conditions in subsection (3) about when the improvement was done. And any reduction in value attributable to the tenant's failure to comply with the terms of the tenancy is ignored, so a tenant cannot argue the rent down by pointing at damage they caused.

Subsection (4) excludes service charges within the meaning of section 18 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 from "rent", while including sums for the use of furniture and council tax. Subsection (7) sets the date the new rent takes effect: normally the beginning of the new period specified in the landlord's notice, but the tribunal may direct a later date, up to the date of determination, if the earlier date would cause the tenant undue hardship. And subsection (8) lets the parties stop the process - the tribunal need not continue if landlord and tenant give written notice that they no longer want a determination.

When it applies

  • A tenant who has referred a section 13 rent increase notice to the tribunal.
  • A tenant who paid for a new bathroom or kitchen and is being charged rent on the improved property.
  • A landlord arguing the current rent is far below market for comparable flats.
  • Working out whether the tribunal's decision could raise the rent above what the landlord asked for.
  • A tenant worried about being backdated to the date in the landlord's notice.

What this section does not say

  • It is not an affordability test. The tribunal determines an open market rent, not what the tenant can pay.
  • It does not guarantee a reduction. The determination is of the market rent, and the tribunal is not bound by the figure the landlord proposed.
  • It does not deal with service charges. Subsection (4) excludes service charges as defined by section 18 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
  • It does not consider the state of the property as damaged by the tenant. Subsection (2)(c) disregards reductions in value caused by the tenant's own breaches.
  • It does not credit every improvement. The tenant's improvement must be a relevant improvement, which subsection (3) defines by reference to when and under what obligation it was carried out.

Worked examples

Invented situations, written to show how the wording bites. They are not real cases, not judgments and not precedent, and nothing here predicts what would happen in yours.

Illustrative example

A tenant fitted a new kitchen at their own expense three years into the tenancy, with the landlord's written agreement. The landlord now proposes a higher rent and points at the kitchen as justification.

How the wording applies

Subsection (2)(b) requires the tribunal to disregard any increase in value attributable to a relevant improvement carried out by the tenant, so a tenant does not pay rent on their own work. The fact that decides whether the disregard applies is whether it was a relevant improvement within subsection (3) - which turns on when it was carried out and whether the tenant was obliged to do it under the terms of the tenancy, not simply on who paid.

How the parties settled it

The landlord agrees to base the proposed rent on the property as it was before the kitchen was fitted, and the tenant agrees to the resulting figure without referring it to the tribunal.

Illustrative example

A tenant paying well below the going rate for the street refers a rent increase to the tribunal, expecting the increase to be reduced. They are worried the tribunal could set a figure higher than the landlord asked for.

How the wording applies

Section 14 is an open market valuation of this dwelling on these terms - what a willing landlord could reasonably expect in the open market - and not a judgment about affordability for this tenant. Subsection (2)(a) requires the effect of the tenancy being granted to a sitting tenant to be disregarded. The fact that makes the referral a risk is that the tribunal determines the market rent and is not bound by the landlord's proposed figure.

How the parties settled it

The parties agree a phased increase over two years to a figure between the current rent and the landlord's proposal, with no referral to the tribunal and no further increase during the phasing.

That's the law. Now let's settle your problem.

Say what is happening. A neutral mediator hears your side and the other party's, and walks you both to a written agreement. In the advanced settings you can ask for the decision to be reasoned on the Acts of Parliament that apply in England and Wales.

This is with

Or open a session directly and invite the other party.

We copy this text from the official publisher and re-check it against that source on every page load, but we cannot guarantee it is complete, current or free of error, and we accept no liability for any reliance on it. An amendment can take effect before a consolidation catches up. The publisher's own copy is linked below; where the two differ, it is the official one that counts.

This page reproduces the text of HA 1988 s. 14 in force at the date shown and explains it in general terms. It is not legal advice and takes no account of the circumstances of your case, which can change the answer completely. For a live dispute, for limitation periods, and before taking any step in court, consult a qualified lawyer in England and Wales.

← All UK legislation pages